Which is better: sign Fülkrog or look for an alternative striker (e.g., Zirkzee or Luka)?
Honestly this question came up for me during a long drive with friends after a weekend match. We were throwing names around and realized how different these options actually are. Fullkrug feels like the safe, experienced choice, while guys like Zirkzee or Luka sound more exciting but also more unpredictable. I remember Milan choosing experience over potential before, and sometimes it brought stability even if it wasn’t flashy. At the same time, part of me wonders if aiming younger wouldn’t make more sense long-term. Curious how others see this balance between now and later.
4 Views
From my side, it really depends on what Milan need immediately. If the goal is to add structure and reliability to the attack, then Fullkrug makes some sense, especially as a short-term solution. Alternatives like Zirkzee or Luka might offer more upside, but they also need time and patience, which isn’t always available. I was reading https://sempremilan.com/few-goals-lots-of-games-missed-what-questions-does-fullkrug-answer-for-milan
and it helped frame why the club might lean toward experience despite the risks. I’ve seen teams I follow struggle after betting only on potential, so a mixed approach wouldn’t surprise me.